Introduction
I decided to do a bit of research for that quality
sleeping bag I'd always promised myself. I knew it'd be expensive
to get what I wanted, but my birthday was coming up and there
was the possibility of a few subs. The sleeping bag had to be
exceptionally light but also very warm - having been caught out
in a snowstorm at 2,500 feet in late April, I didn't want to face
that possibility again. So light, warm, functional, compact and
light - in other words I was looking for the holy grail
of bags.
But I was successful in my quest and, it was during my wanderings
through the Internet, I found a hidden warren of sites dedicated
to the lightweight backpacker and the even more extreme movement,
the ultralight backpacker. This is my take on both the lightweight
and the ultralightweight.
So What is it?
So what is "Lightweight" and "Ultralight"
back packing? There are probably many takes on lightweight and
ultralight backpacking, but this is my understanding of the thinking
behind it.
| It is the art of fine tuning the equipment you take on a
trip based on specific needs, whilst keeping the weight of
items as low as possibly and eliminating non-essential items. |
Combine this with actively sourcing good quality, lightweight
and small equipment and you have the bare bones of what this philosophy
is all about. Obvious as it may sound, many of us carry far too
much unnecessary weight when we head for the hills, myself included.
Packing Light - Why bother?
The idea of lightweight backpacking will not appeal to everyone.
Some people have their own methods and techniques developed over
the years and will be satisfied that these provide them with the
best solution. Other people just like to carry everything so they
are prepared for every eventuality.
However, the "Lightweights", as I like to call them,
go light so they can move faster and for longer.
Lighter, smaller loads mean you can then get away with lighter,
smaller rucksacks and lighter footwear, increasing speed
again and creating a kind of ever decreasing circle effect. This
then, in turn, lessens the environmental impact that is particularly
obvious when climbing some of the popular routes in Scotland.
Also, another reason cited for going light is to reduce the
impact that hiking with heavy packs has on your body.
With your knees the first to feel the full force of a heavy pack
after a long day’s walk, a reduction in back pack weight
can help reduce injuries and the overall impact on your body,potentially
prolonging your hiking life into old age.
However, it should be noted that as American led movement, it
doesn’t take into account, for example, of the type of terrain
encountered in Scotland which is generally not suitable for trail
trainers or even lightweight boots. In the US, by contrast, a
good percentage of the trails are less rugged as well as established
and well maintained.
Basis for a Lightweight Pack
Rucksacks
Believe it or not (and I hadn’t thought about it) the
weight of your rucksack can make an enormous difference. A conventional
50 to 60 litre rucksacks weigh in at between 2 and 2.5kg compared
to the new breeds of rucksacks such as Crux, Golite and Gregory
Packs which weigh between 0.6 kg and 1.4 kg - in some cases nearly
a quarter of the weight of a regular pack.
This is achieved by using lighter materials, incorporating less
features and reducing the amount of suspension and padding and
based on numerous reviews, durability and comfort does not seem
to have suffered. Although designed for lighter loads, the suspension
can still hold up to about 15 kg. However, as a result of the
modified design and lightweight materials the packs may feel flimsy
and insubstantial to some walkers. Some of the larger brands have
now rather belatedly started to produce lighter sacks, although
the lightest of these are about 1.5kg.
Base Weight Explained
Base pack weight is used as the basis for weight comparison of
packs.
Definition: Weight of the pack containing all
your equipment excluding food, fuel and water, as these items
vary with the season and trip length. This provides a level playing
field for the accurate measurement of pack weights which fit within
the following categories:
- Ultralight under 5 kg
- Lightweight 5-10 kg
- Conventional 10-15 kg
- Heavy over 15 kg
For a comparison of the categories go to: Backpackinglight.com
(.pdf document that requires Adobe Acrobat)
Tents Versus Tarps
The differences in climate between Britain and the US has a
marked effect on the type of shelter that is chosen for backpacking.
As their weather tends to be more settled for longer periods,
alot of the US Lightweights use tarps as shelter (and walking
poles as supports) therefore minimising weight.
However, even during the summer in Scotland a solid sturdy tent
that can handle any storm is preferable for our variable weather.
Also, you would have to have a death wish to sleep out with only
a tarp for cover in Scotland and be exposed to the dreaded Scottish
midge. Click here
for more information on tarps in the UK.
So reality must play a part here and a decent and light two
man 3-4 season tent is essential and will weigh between 1.8 and
3 kg while quality solo tents will weigh somewhere between 1.1
kg and 1.8 kg. A tarp weighs well under a 1 kg.
Another option that bridges the gap between tents and tarps is
the bivy bag which can weigh as little as 600g. These are becoming
progressively more advanced, some even have a front hoop to help
avoid feelings of claustrophobia However, they are not everyone’s
cup of tea.
Sleeping Bags
Again the compromise here is between weight and warmth, not
to mention cost. The lightest weight : warmth ratio is provided
by a down filling but this is more expensive than synthetic materials
and also less practical in some ways.
Pros for Down Sleeping Bags
- Lightest weight : warmth ratio
- Durability: Down bags, if stored properly, can last for much
longer than synthetic bags, justifying their often higher initial
cost and possibly being cheaper in the long run. Synthetic bags
loose their insulating effectiveness over a shorter period of
time, especially if they are heavily used.
Cons for Down Sleeping Bags
- More expensive than synthetic bags
- If a down sleeping bag gets wet, for example, it loses all
it’s insulation properties whereas a wet synthetic bag
only loses 50%. But keeping your bag dry shouldn’t be
a problem for more experienced backpackers especially with the
latest water repellant materials that are now available.
- Down bags are also harder to clean than their synthetic cousins.
Sleeping bags come with many different designs and different
features so it will be down to careful decision-making and personal
preference when it comes to choosing one. Manufacturers provide
temperature ratings but these can only really be used as a rough
guide as everyone feels different levels of coldness. Work on
the basis that this is a over-optimistic temperature range.
Sleeping Mats
Well, there is not a lot you can say about mats except that
as usual it is a compromise. Personally, I won’t sacrifice
weight over comfort here so I use a Therm-A-Rest self inflating
mattress. These are considered heavy-ish among the lightweight
community and can be prone to puncture but there is no way I would
go back to the old style foam mats now.
Having said that the foam mats do have their merits as they provide
excellent insulation, are extremely lightweight and are indestructible.
If you are looking for a Therma Rest mat
that is lightweight, the reviews of the Therm-A-Rest Z-Rest mats
read that they are light as well as effective.
Stoves
Buying a stove, several factors determine what kind of stove
you should choose:
- How many people will you be cooking for?
- What seasons will you be out in?
- Where will you use the stove?
There are three main types of stove – canister,
liquid fuel burner and meths stoves. I am going to leave
meths stoves out of this review because to my mind they are slow,
messy and generally heavy when compared to the other types.
| |
Canister
stoves |
Liquid
fuel burners |
| Info |
- Burn compressed gasses such as butane
- Propane sometimes added to improve performance
|
- burn white gas, kerosene, petrol and paraffin
- Use refillable fuel bottles
|
| Pros |
- Light weight - under 100g (not including the actual
gas canister)
|
- unaffected by the cold
- can burn wide variety of fuel sources
|
| Cons |
- Less efficient at low temperatures (near freezing)
|
- need priming and can be messy
- fiddly compared to the “turn and light”
canister stoves
- weigh a good deal more
|
| Best For: |
- Mainly 3 season backpacker
|
- Winter walking
- Part of a larger group
|
It is purely personal once again – until recently I had
only used canister stoves but I have now mastered the priming
of a multi fuel burner for colder weather.
Suggested Lightweight Kit
The list below is by no means comprehensive and is really a
compilation of equipment that I own or would consider buying.
| Rucksacks |
WEIGHT |
|
Sleeping Bags |
WEIGHT |
RATING |
| Golite Gust 60 Litre |
590g |
|
Marmot Hydrogen |
595g |
-1 C rating |
| Golite Race |
680g |
|
Marmot Helium |
822g |
-9 C rating |
| Golite Trek |
1130g |
|
PHD Minim 600 |
980g |
-13 C rating |
| Crux A50 45+10 Litre |
1080g |
|
M.E. Dewline |
730g |
-5 C rating |
| Gregory G Pack 50 Litre |
1400g |
|
M.E. Lightline |
1230g |
-12 C rating |
| Osprey Aether 60 Litre |
1490g |
|
|
|
|
| Tents |
|
|
|
|
| One
Man Tents |
WEIGHT |
|
Two
Man Tents |
WEIGHT |
| MSR Micro Zoid |
1.3kg |
|
Terra Nova Laser |
1.3kg |
| Mountain Hardwear PCT 1 |
1.6kg |
|
Terra Nova Voyager |
2.6kg |
| Sierra Designs Lightyear CD |
1.7kg |
|
Lightwave T1 Cylq |
1.8kg |
| Terra Nova Laserlite |
1.1kg |
|
Lightwave G1 Cylq |
1.9kg |
| Hilleberg Atko |
1.5kg |
|
Hilleberg Nallo 2 |
2.1kg |
| Lightwave ZR0 Cylq |
1.3kg |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Bivi Bags |
WEIGHT |
|
|
|
| Terra Nova Jupiter |
0.9kg |
|
|
|
| Outdoor Designs Solo Raid |
1.2kg |
|
|
|
| Mats |
WEIGHT |
|
Pots |
WEIGHT |
| Thermarest Ultra Lite 3/4 |
480g |
|
Aluminium mess tins |
300g |
| Z rest |
312g |
|
Trek 700i |
128g |
| Foam Mat |
145g |
|
MSR Titanium kettle |
118g |
| Stoves |
WEIGHT |
|
Torches/headlights |
WEIGHT |
| Primus Alpine Titanium |
96g |
|
Petzl Tikka |
71g |
| Coleman F1 Lite |
77g |
|
Petzl Zipka |
64g |
| MSR Pocket Rocket |
86g |
|
Black Diamond Ion |
40g |
| MSR Whisperlite Int. |
440g |
|
Princeton Tec Aurora |
80g |
| MSR XGK |
480g |
|
|
|
Summary
"Becoming more lightweight" costs both time and money
- it is as much your own personal preference as the weight and
cost. You simply have to decide what is best for you.
There are so many products and options to choose from, it is
often difficult to distinguish between the different manufacturers
as well as different models or lines. Some products label themselves
as lightweight or ultralight weight but this is clearly not the
case. This can just make the decision-making process longer and
more tortuous. But it is crucial to remember that lightweight
products needn’t always be more expensive or less durable.
It is more likely you will replace items as they need replacing
and the amount of walking you do and your budget relating to how
much expense can be spared. With a gradual move into the lightweight
world you can work out what combinations of equipment will suit
you as an individual, as well as the type of backpacking you do
and the typical weather you encounter.
It might not suit everyone but lightening up will certainly
improve many people’s experience in the hills .....and,
if like me, you embrace the lightweight philosophy – well,
I might just bump into you at the local outdoor shop as I’m
off to buy the lightest titanium pot I can find………
Links and Other Information
General information see: HikeLite.co.uk
and Backpacking.net
See the below links for guidance and advice on sleeping bags.
Click here for more information on stoves:
For gear reviews go to: Outdoorsmagic.com |